The
improvising jazzman is constantly questioning a delicate
balance, the balance that must exist betvveen the expected
and the unexpected, between vwhat the listener can foresee
and what the listener can be surprised by. The whole
history of' jazz, as beset by triteness on one of its
ends, by pure arbitrariness on he other, could be viewed
as the vicissitudes of that halance.
The
will to free themselves from harmonic, melodic and rhythrinc
boundaries which informs most present day young jazzmen
brings back the above-mentionned balance problem. The
members of CM4 have coped with it by means of the musical
inteqrity shown by their work in this record. The structures
and articulations of For John Tchicai, for instance,
stand out clearly through the rhythmic fluctuations,
the transformations and overlappings of melodic lines
and the passages where improvisers are let free. There
is a rhythmic pattern gradually gaining shape under
the alto recitative: it brings forth the rhythmic figures
that allow the piano's affirmation when it soloes. These
figures, developed through the bass solo, precede the
return of the alto, which ends the piece with a niew
recitative. The symmetry between end and beginning as
well as the repeated and modified rhythmic patterns
act as a framework both for the musicians' improvisation
and the listeners'attention. Similar, though adapted
to the character of each piece, features are to be found
throughout the music in the record.
The
evident admiration the members of the group have for
leading American musiciens such as McCoy Tyner, John
Coltrane, Jackie Mc Lean, Richard Davis and Elvin Jones,
has stimulated the expression of their own musical personalities,
while strengthening the quartet's cohesion. For balance
befween individual and collective expression is yet
another constant feature in the history of jazz.
Demètre
Ioakimidis